General Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00706
Petitioner: Clarence Daniel Jones
Respondent: Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Virga We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv05626
Petitioner: Daniel Jones
Respondent: T. V. Virga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v McCall We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2013cv00749
Petitioner: James Daniel Jones
Respondent: Michael McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Giambruno
as 10-4667
Petitioner - Appellant: Daniel Jones
Respondent - Appellee: Michael E. Giambruno, Superintendent
Jones v. Giambruno
as 10-1901
Petitioner - Appellant: Daniel Jones
Respondent - Appellee: Michael E. Giambruno
Daniel Jones v. Troy Steele, et al
as 08-1750
Petitioner - Appellant: Daniel Jones
Respondent - Appellee: Troy Steele and Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon
Jones v. Padula et al
as 6:2007cv01697
Petitioner: James Daniel Jones
Respondent: Anthony Padula and State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. United States of America
as 4:2007cv01652
Petitioner: Daniel Jones
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCullough v. Jones et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00071
Plaintiff: Christopher McCullough
Defendant: Daniel Jones and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCullough v. Jones et al (INMATE2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00026
Plaintiff: Christopher McCullough
Defendant: Daniel Jones and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?