Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Dempsey v. People of the State of Calfornia
as 2:2016cv01565
Petitioner:
Charles Wayne Dempsey, Jr.
Respondent:
People of the State of Calfornia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OSARIO v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2015cv07835
Petitioner:
LUIS OSARIO
Respondent:
KIRBY WARDEN and DEMPSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dempsey v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2014cv02192
Petitioner:
Timothy J Dempsey
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnell Dempsey v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 13-31090
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNELL DEMPSEY
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Kenvin Dempsey Wallace v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2013cv07352
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Petitioner:
Kenvin Dempsey Wallace
Sutton v. Director TDCJ
as 9:2013cv00226
Petitioner:
Dempsey Leon Sutton
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas Dempsey, III v. Warden Willie Eagleton
as 13-6104
Petitioner - Appellant:
DOUGLAS DEMPSEY, III
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN WILLIE L. EAGLETON
Dempsey v. Eagleton
as 0:2012cv03254
Petitioner:
Douglas Dempsey, III
Respondent:
Willie Eagleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dempsey v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv00118
Petitioner:
Adrian Dempsey
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOYER v. CAMDEN SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2012cv01195
Petitioner:
ANDRE BOYER
Respondent:
CAMDEN SUPERIOR COURT, JUDGE EYNON, MINDY MELLETS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
