General Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 181
Linsford Gill v. David Mitchell
as 22-2720
Petitioner / Appellant: LINSFORD GILL
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID MITCHELL
Sikes v. Warden, FCI Marianna
as 1:2022cv22880
Plaintiff: Edward Gill Sikes
Defendant: Warden, FCI Marianna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marvin Gill v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12743
Petitioner / Appellant: MARVIN C. GILL
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Gill v. Lumpkin
as 22-10407
Petitioner / Appellant: Rudolfo Gill
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Gill v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02073
Petitioner: Kenneth F. Gill
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jean-Gilles v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Manatee County)
as 8:2022cv00674
Petitioner: Excellent Jean-Gilles
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gill v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02216
Petitioner: Raymond Edward Gill
Respondent: United States of |America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gill v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv02747
Petitioner: Larry Dean Gill
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Buchanan v Howard
as 4:2021cv00247
Petitioner: Ralph James Buchanan, Jr., Daniel Gill and Vincent DeMarco
Respondent: Catricia Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gill v. United States of America
as 6:2021cv00622
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Raymond Edward Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?