Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Roach v. Attorney General
as 3:2022cv05226
Petitioner:
John Edward Roach
Respondent:
Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SWIFT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2021cv00243
Petitioner:
DONNIE JAVON SWIFT
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN EDWARD WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT DEREK OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James III v. Nanos et al
as 4:2021cv00341
Petitioner:
John Edwards James and John Edwards James, III
Respondent:
Christopher Nanos and Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nails v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv00434
Petitioner:
John Edward Nails
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2021cv01791
Petitioner:
John Edward Hall
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reichmuth v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv00683
Petitioner:
John Edward Reichmuth
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Bastrop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(HC) Findley v. County of El Dorado et al
as 2:2021cv01117
Respondent:
John D'Agostino and County of El Dorado
Petitioner:
John Edward Findley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lofton v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00714
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
John Edward Lofton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Butler v. Stanley
as 5:2021hc02098
Petitioner:
John Edward Butler
Respondent:
Mr. Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2021cv01200
Petitioner:
Clinton Robinson
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN EDWARD WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
