General Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 433
Pyles v. Freshour et al
as 1:2023cv01281
Petitioner: Terry L Pyles
Respondent: Alex Freshour, Ryan Sterbing and Matt Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moen v. Satterberg et al
as 3:2023cv00147
Petitioner: Daniel-William Moen
Respondent: Daniel T. Satterberg, Julia Garratt, Ketu Shah and others
Travis Lane v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 23-2066
Plaintiff / Appellant: TRAVIS LANE
Defendant / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
Lloyd Hammond v. James Green
as 23-5502
Petitioner / Appellant: LLOYD HAMMOND
Respondent / Appellee: TIM LANE, Warden, Green River Correctional Complex and JAMES DAVID GREEN, Warden, Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
Clifford Gooden, III v. Tim Lane
as 23-2277
Petitioner / Appellant: Clifford A. Gooden, III
Respondent / Appellee: Tim Lane, Sheriff of Scott County Jail
Lane v. Fuhre
as 6:2023cv00756
Petitioner: Gilbert Lewis Lowe and Gilbert Lewis Lane
Respondent: Cory Fuhre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayson Jr v. State of Tennessee, The
as 3:2023cv00549
Petitioner: Ricky Lane Grayson Jr
Respondent: State of Tennessee, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mosley v. Williams
as 1:2023cv02260
Petitioner: Mr. Demetrius Mosley
Respondent: Mr. Doug Williams, Judge Craig L. Schwall, T. Coun. Tawanna L. Payton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brent Mullis v. Chris Lane
as 23-1946
Petitioner / Appellant: BRENT D. MULLIS
Respondent / Appellee: CHRIS LANE, Sheriff, Bartholomew County, Indiana
Alan Hicks v. Donnie Ames
as 23-6447
Petitioner / Appellant: ALAN LANE HICKS
Respondent / Appellee: DONNIE AMES, Superintendent

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?