Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Banks v. Roe et al
as 3:2017cv00329
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R Hornak, Soo Song and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banks v. Cessar et al
as 2:2017cv01988
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency, Robert Cessar, Federal Bureau Of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banks v. Song et al
as 3:2017cv00440
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Robert Cessar, Federal Bureau Of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banks v. Roe et al
as 4:2017cv04092
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Roe et al
as 4:2017cv01258
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Frederick Banks v. Mark Wietzman, et al
as 17-1678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK G. WIETZMAN, Esq., DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, United States Department of Justice and others
Frederick Banks v. Dr. Allissa Marquez, et al
as 17-6387
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Respondent - Appellee:
DR. ALLISSA MARQUEZ, DR. LOGAN GRADDY, DR. CAHILL and others
Banks v. Marquez et al
as 5:2017ct03064
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Allissa Marquez, Logan Graddy, Dr. Cahill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. McCorkle et al
as 5:2016hc02139
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
C/O McCorkle, Thomas Smith, Mark Hornack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Sacaranto et al
as 5:2016hc02135
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
A. Sacaranto, J. Walker, A. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
