Cases 21 - 30 of 121
Harry Barron v. Donald Ames
as 22-7144
Petitioner / Appellant:
HARRY A. BARRON
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD F. AMES, Superintendent, Mt. Olive, WV
Barron v. United States of America
as 0:2022cv01797
Petitioner:
Joshua Paul Barron
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barron-Salazar v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Manatee County)
as 8:2022cv01121
Petitioner:
Juan Roberto Barron-Salazar
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adam J. Joiner v. Warden Barron
as 5:2022cv00497
Petitioner:
Adam J. Joiner
Respondent:
Warden Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Barron #322902 v. Macauley
as 1:2022cv00107
Petitioner:
Christopher Barron #322902
Respondent:
Matt Macauley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bernic L. Woodson, Jr. v. Howard Barron
as 5:2022cv00075
Petitioner:
Bernic L. Woodson, Jr.
Respondent:
Howard Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Henard v. Shradder
as 1:2021cv03123
Petitioner:
Bobby E. Henard
Respondent:
Jeff Shradder
Defendant:
Well Path Medical Services, Monica L. Alberts, Jamie Xiong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barron-Zamora v. Friend
as 5:2021cv00264
Petitioner:
Adrian Barron-Zamora
Respondent:
Martin Friend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Adrian Barajas v. Michael Carvajal et al
as 2:2021cv08458
Petitioner:
Adrian Barajas
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal, T. Justino and A. Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fernandez-Barron v. United States
as 1:2021cv00771
Petitioner:
Carlos Fernandez-Barron
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
