General Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 441
Travis Lane v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 23-2066
Plaintiff / Appellant: TRAVIS LANE
Defendant / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
Lloyd Hammond v. James Green
as 23-5502
Petitioner / Appellant: LLOYD HAMMOND
Respondent / Appellee: TIM LANE, Warden, Green River Correctional Complex and JAMES DAVID GREEN, Warden, Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
Grayson Jr v. State of Tennessee, The
as 3:2023cv00549
Petitioner: Ricky Lane Grayson Jr
Respondent: State of Tennessee, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifford Gooden, III v. Tim Lane
as 23-2277
Petitioner / Appellant: Clifford A. Gooden, III
Respondent / Appellee: Tim Lane, Sheriff of Scott County Jail
Lane v. Fuhre
as 6:2023cv00756
Petitioner: Gilbert Lewis Lowe and Gilbert Lewis Lane
Respondent: Cory Fuhre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brent Mullis v. Chris Lane
as 23-1946
Petitioner / Appellant: BRENT D. MULLIS
Respondent / Appellee: CHRIS LANE, Sheriff, Bartholomew County, Indiana
Mosley v. Williams
as 1:2023cv02260
Petitioner: Mr. Demetrius Mosley
Respondent: Mr. Doug Williams, Judge Craig L. Schwall, T. Coun. Tawanna L. Payton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Huneycutt We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00273
Petitioner: Rodwyn Taylor
Respondent: Lane Huneycutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alan Hicks v. Donnie Ames
as 23-6447
Petitioner / Appellant: ALAN LANE HICKS
Respondent / Appellee: DONNIE AMES, Superintendent
Grayson v. Martin
as 3:2023cv00351
Petitioner: Ricky Lane Grayson
Respondent: Frink Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?