Cases 31 - 40 of 961
Poff v. Warden Smith
as 4:2023cv02046
Plaintiff:
Julia Ann Poff
Defendant:
Warden Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Richard Rapozo v. Attorney General for the State of Hawaii, et al
as 23-15769
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD B. RAPOZO
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF HAWAII, SHAWN WEAD, Director of Dept of Corrections and ANNE E. LOPEZ, Attorney General of the State of Hawaii
Rademacher v. Segal
as 0:2023cv01292
Petitioner:
Beth Ann Rademacher
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Poff v. Warden Smith
as 4:2023cv00463
Petitioner:
Julia Ann Poff
Respondent:
Warden Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
CAPPS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00375
Petitioner:
LORREE ANN CAPPS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rapozo v. Hawaii, State of
as 1:2023cv00188
Petitioner:
Richard B. Rapozo and Richard Ropozo and Richard Borges Rapozo
Respondent:
Attorney General Hawaii, State of, Warden Shawn Wead and Anne E. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flora #419147 v. Howard
as 1:2023cv00346
Petitioner:
Denise Ann Flora and Denise Ann Flora #419147
Respondent:
Jeremy Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kuc v. Warden Needly
as 7:2023cv00433
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Ann Kuc, Auntie and Beth
Respondent:
Warden Needly and Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Liberty Walden v. Jeremy Howard
as 23-1279
Petitioner / Appellant:
LIBERTY ANNE WALDEN
Respondent / Appellee:
JEREMY HOWARD, Warden
Ronald Johnson v. Anne Precythe
as 23-1569
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ronald Johnson
Respondent / Appellee:
Anne L. Precythe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
