General Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Schmidt v. Paramo et al
as 3:2014cv01851
Petitioner: Christopher Michael Schmidt
Respondent: Daniel Paramo and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fuller v. State of Texas
as 1:2014cv00610
Petitioner: Christopher Michael Fuller
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Respondent: State of Texas
Defendant: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MASSEY v. LASSITER
as 1:2013cv00478
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL MASSEY
Respondent: KENNETH E. LASSITER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Rowland v. McDonald
as 13-55732
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL ROWLAND
Respondent - Appellee: MCDONALD, Warden
Christopher Forney v. David Ballard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-6115
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL FORNEY
Respondent - Appellee: DAVID BALLARD, Warden
Christopher Dannar v. Marty Anderson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1764
Petitioner - Appellant: Christopher Michael Dannar
Respondent - Appellee: Marty C. Anderson, Warden, United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners
Forney v. Ballard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00128
Petitioner: Christopher Michael Forney
Respondent: David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christopher Michael Rowland v. McDonald We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv04671
Respondent: Warden McDonald
Petitioner: Christopher Michael Rowland
Dannar v. Anderson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2010cv03228
Petitioner: Christopher Michael Dannar
Respondent: Marty Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rowland v. McDonald We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01460
Petitioner: Christopher Michael Rowland
Respondent: McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?