General Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 95
Patrick v. Bishop et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2017cv02445
Petitioner: David G. Patrick
Respondent: Frank Bishop and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Menghistab v. Landmeier
as 2:2017cv01064
Petitioner: Mathusala Menghistab
Respondent: David G Beth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mahd v. Rivero We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00851
Petitioner: Hussein Mohd Mahd
Respondent: David G Beth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pflum v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv04064
Petitioner: David G. Pflum
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LeBlanc v. Beth et al
as 2:2016cv00302
Plaintiff: Gilbert A LeBlanc
Defendant: David G Beth and Robert Croeker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harris v. Thaler
as 5:2016cv00142
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Petitioner: David G. Harris
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vidal v. Nooth
as 2:2016cv00072
Respondent: Mark Nooth
Petitioner: David G. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Glebe We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00271
Petitioner: David G. Rice
Respondent: Pat Glebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Hickey v. McComis
as 4:2015cv00047
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Petitioner: Steve Allen Hickey
Respondent: David G. McComis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hickey v. McComis
as 4:2015cv00040
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Petitioner: Steven Allen Hickey
Respondent: Warden David G. McComis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?