Cases 31 - 40 of 1,378
Efrain Perez v. Warden Beckley FCI
as 23-2836
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EFRAIN PEREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN BECKLEY FCI
Perez v. Hanson
as 2:2023cv00243
Petitioner:
Mario A Perez
Respondent:
Warden Ralph Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jazmine Perez v. Warden of Victorville Camp FCI Med, I
as 2:2023cv07713
Petitioner:
Jazmine Perez
Respondent:
Warden of Victorville Camp FCI Med, I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC) Perez v. Arviza
as 1:2023cv01341
Petitioner:
Yoryi Perez
Respondent:
M. Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Perez v. Field Office Director for Detention and Removal et al
as 1:2023cv03984
Petitioner:
Elvin Chavarria Perez
Respondent:
Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Cisneros v. Neeley
as 7:2023cv01165
Petitioner:
Fabiola Perez Cisneros
Respondent:
Kimberly Neeley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perez-Rodriguez v. Janson
as 3:2023cv01423
Petitioner:
Jonathan Perez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Sean Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perez Gonzalez v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02190
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Perez Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Young v. Lubbock County Sheriff
as 5:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Charles Young
Respondent:
TDCJ Parole Division, Daniella Martinez, Vicente Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC)Perez-Valencia v. Warden
as 1:2023cv01123
Petitioner:
Mayel Perez-Valencia
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
