Cases 31 - 40 of 133
Stith v. Ramsey
as 1:2018cv01585
Respondent:
Lyndia Person Ramsey
Petitioner:
Abdual Kareen Stith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pineda Robles v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2018cv11551
Petitioner:
Angel Esmelin Pineda Robles
Respondent:
All other persons exercising direct legal custody over Petitioner, Jerome White, Matthew Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
WILEY v. WARDEN FCI McKEAN
as 1:2018cv00363
Defendant:
ACTING WARDEN OF THE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION MCKEAN-RESPONDENT-THE PERSON HAVING CUSTODY OF THE COMPLAINANT
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE WILEY, JR.
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCGHEE v. PERSON COUNTY COURT et al
as 1:2018cv00883
Petitioner:
JOSEPH CASEY MCGHEE
Respondent:
PERSON COUNTY COURT, JUDGE OSMAND SMITH and CARL FOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sir Williams v. Kevin Doohan, et al
as 18-35644
Petitioner - Appellant:
SIR JAMES WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
KEVIN DOOHAN, Parole Officer and MICHAEL WU, Chair Person Parole Board
David Salazar v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-16189
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID ANTHONY SALAZAR
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Name of the Director of the Department of Corrections, Jailor or authorized person having custody of Petitioner and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Person v. Gray
as 5:2018cv01374
Petitioner:
Larry D. Person
Respondent:
David Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Persons v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2018cv01475
Petitioner:
Marlo Donta Persons
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Luis Bautista v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-15471
Petitioner - Appellant:
LUIS ALBERTO BAUTISTA
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Name of the Director of the Department of Corrections, Jailor or authorized person having custody of Peitioner and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
