Cases 41 - 50 of 664
Rios v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv00095
Petitioner:
Robert Rios
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rios v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00150
Petitioner:
Ricardo Villanueva Rios
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone and Warden, USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rios v. State of Washington
as 3:2022cv05931
Petitioner:
Luciano Molina Rios
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rios v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00149
Petitioner:
Luis Villanueva Rios
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone and Warden, USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Philip Grigsby v. Catricia Howard, et al
as 22-16180
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILIP ANDRA GRIGSBY
Respondent / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD, A. TORRES, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, G. MERRELL, Incident Report Investigator and others
Garcia v. Rios et al
as 2:2022cv00507
Petitioner:
Louis Garcia
Respondent:
Hector Rios, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico and Hector Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quintero Rios v. Lumpkin
as 22-50614
Petitioner / Appellant:
Steve Enrique Quintero Rios
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rios v. Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
as 9:2022cv00095
Petitioner:
Samuel Rios
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rios v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Rios
Defendant:
John Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jaquess v. Rios et al
as 2:2022cv00409
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jaquess
Respondent:
Hector Rios and Attorney General of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
