Cases 41 - 50 of 7,146
Belvin v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02046
Petitioner:
Frederick Belvin
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Bustos v. Taylor
as 1:2024cv00259
Petitioner:
Juan Bustos
Respondent:
T. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Livingston v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02044
Petitioner:
Cedric Livingston
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cossari v. Stover
as 3:2024cv00255
Petitioner:
Rodney T. Cossari
Respondent:
R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brown v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Jamel T. Brown
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Terrence Whitaker v. Randall Hepp
as 24-1286
Petitioner:
TERRENCE T. WHITAKER
Respondent:
RANDALL HEPP
Brailford v. State of Maryland
as 1:2024cv00568
Petitioner:
Michael T. Brailford
Respondent:
State of Maryland and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parsons v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2024cv80203
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Parsons
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schulz et al v Petersen
as 9:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Gary Schulz, David T. Crafton and Valentino Satoshi Vanderbilt
Respondent:
Jeremiah Petersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VINSON v. GARLAND
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
JASON MORGAN VINSON
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, JOY ODOM, MARC T TREADWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
