General Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 82
Pettis v. Hedgpeth We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00978
Petitioner: Terry Pettis
Respondent: Anthony Hedgpeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pettis v. Hedgpeth
as 2:2009cv01489
Petitioner: Terry Pettis
Respondent: Anthony Hedgpeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. PETTY
as 2:2009cv00030
Petitioner: GREGORY DAVIS
Respondent: LT PETTY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Petty v. Driver et al
as 8:2008cv02301
Petitioner: Robert William Petty
Respondent: Joe D. Driver and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Petty v. Padula We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2008cv02967
Petitioner: Gary L Petty
Respondent: Anthony J Padula
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kenneth Pettis v. State of California
as 2:2008cv05582
Petitioner: Kenneth Pettis
Respondent: State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Petty v. Price et al
as 5:2008cv00265
Petitioner: Ross Oneal Petty
Respondent: Cheryl Price and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Petty v. Driver We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00140
Petitioner: Stanley Lemech Petty, Jr.
Respondent: Joe D. Driver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Petty v. Connolly et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv06090
Petitioner: Jamal Petty
Respondent: William J. Connolly and Andrew Cuomo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETTIS v. MCDONOUGH
as 5:2007cv00093
Petitioner: ROY PETTIS
Respondent: JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?