Cases 81 - 90 of 1,872
Anderson v. Thomas
as 0:2023cv01137
Petitioner:
Jason Anderson
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anderson v. Jones
as 23-20130
Petitioner / Appellant:
Sonya Chandler Anderson
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and David Jones
NEAL v. ANDERSON
as 1:2023cv00285
Petitioner:
GLENN WHICKER NEAL, JR.
Respondent:
BEN ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Jones
as 4:2023cv01188
Petitioner:
Sonya Chandler Anderson
Respondent:
David Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NEAL v. ANDERSON
as 1:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
GLENN WHICKER NEAL, JR.
Respondent:
BEN ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryan-Lever v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2023cv00180
Petitioner:
Anderson Bryan-Lever
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anderson v. Warden, FPC Pensacola
as 8:2023cv00596
Petitioner:
Kent D. Anderson
Respondent:
Warden, FPC Pensacola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ruiz Rendon v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2023cv00126
Petitioner:
Anderson Ruiz Rendon
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00056
Petitioner:
Dean Anderson
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2023cv60286
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Anderson
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
