Cases 1 - 10 of 393
Santos v. Holloway et al
as 6:2024cv03328
Petitioner:
Eliseo Santos
Respondent:
Ryan Holloway and Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Santos-Bey et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv01490
Petitioner:
Erick Santos-Bey and Lawrence H. Morgan
Respondent:
Anthony Brown and Carlos Bivens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CABRERA ARTEAGA v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv05441
Petitioner:
SANTOS EDELMIR CABRERA ARTEAGA
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
De Los Santos v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Sandy De Los Santos
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Santos v. Bodiford
as 5:2024cv01244
Petitioner:
Eliseo Santos
Respondent:
Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santos v. Unknown Respondent
as 1:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Andreuris Santos
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Orellana-Hernandez v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Santos Orellana-Hernandez
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Santos Mota v. Warden Indiana County Jail, et al
as 24-1205
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA
Defendant:
WARDEN INDIANA COUNTY JAIL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Santos v. Unknown Respondent
as 5:2024hc02019
Petitioner:
Andreuris Santos
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pecora v. Kimberly
as 1:2023cv01632
Petitioner:
Jesse Santo Pecora
Respondent:
M Kimberly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
