Cases 1 - 10 of 229
Wayne Davis v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 24-1858
Plaintiff:
WAYNE A. DAVIS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BLAIR COUNTY
VAUGHN v. WEEKS et al
as 3:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
JASON W. VAUGHN
Respondent:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BLAIR COUNTY and WARDEN ABBY TATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burd v. Zaken et al
as 3:2023cv00312
Petitioner:
Drue Scott Burd
Respondent:
Superintendent Zaken, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blair v. Wyoming Attorney General et al
as 2:2023cv00175
Petitioner:
Jonathon Tyson Blair
Respondent:
Wyoming Attorney General and Wyoming Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blair v. Lowerre
as 9:2023cv01015
Petitioner:
Nailon Blair
Respondent:
E. Lowerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blair v. Lowerre
as 6:2023cv06420
Petitioner:
Nailon Blair
Respondent:
E. Lowerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. GOURLEY, et al.
as 3:2023cv00118
Petitioner:
WAYNE A. DAVIS
Respondent:
MICHAEL GOURLEY and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BLAIR COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Yates
as 2:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Tracey Blair Phillips
Defendant:
Doe and John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Urban v. Warden Blair
as 2:2023cv04070
Petitioner:
Joshua Robert Urban
Respondent:
Warden Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noonan v. Green
as 5:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
James J. Noonan and James Blair, Jr.
Respondent:
James D. Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
