Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Bray Murray v. Warden SCI Pittsburgh, et al
as 24-2145
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and WARDEN SCI PITTSBURGH
Plaintiff:
BRAY JIBRIL MURRAY
Bray v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Reginald Bray
Respondent:
H. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bray v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
Reginald Bray
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chambliss v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Raheem Chambliss
Respondent:
Lt. Bray, Sheriff Milum and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Bray v. John Yates
as 23-2148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Brian Bray
Defendant / Appellee:
John P. Yates, Warden of FCI-Forrest City (Originally named as USA and Doe)
Bray Murray v. Warden SCI Pittsburgh, et al
as 23-1753
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRAY JIBRIL MURRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SCI PITTSBURGH, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Bray v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Kevin Brian Bray
Defendant:
USA, Doe and John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Laurack D. Bray v. State of California et al
as 2:2022cv02762
Petitioner:
Laurack D. Bray
Respondent:
State of California and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas R. Bray v. D. Samuels et al
as 5:2022cv00347
Petitioner:
Douglas R Bray
Respondent:
D Samuels and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Motion to Extend Time to File
Bray v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 3:2021cv00651
Petitioner:
Blaine Andrew Bray
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky and Kevin Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
