Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Burns v. United States District Court
as 2:2022cv01041
Petitioner:
David C Burns
Respondent:
United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Darren Burns v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-10711
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARREN C. BURNS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Robert C Burns v. People of the State of California
as 3:2014cv00445
Petitioner:
Robert C Burns
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Burns v. Stephens
as 3:2013cv03870
Petitioner:
Darren C Burns
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MURRAY v. BURNS et al
as 2:2013cv01867
Petitioner:
TERRY MURRAY
Respondent:
DANIEL C. BURNS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURRAY v. BURNS et al
as 2:2013cv01772
Petitioner:
TERRY MURRAY
Respondent:
DANIEL C. BURNS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert C Burns v. People of the State of California
as 2:2012cv01697
Petitioner:
Robert C Burns
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Smith v. United States District Court for Middle Tennessee
as 3:2011cv00739
Plaintiff:
James Ray Smith
Defendant:
United States District Court for Middle Tennessee, Robert Cooper, Jr., State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burns v. Thurmer
as 2:2009cv01149
Petitioner:
Terrance C Burns
Respondent:
Michael Thurmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURNS v. TAYLOR
as 1:2009cv05072
Petitioner:
MICHAEL C. BURNS
Respondent:
ERIC TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
