Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Miller v. Cobb County State Court
as 1:2024cv04092
Petitioner:
Joshua Eugene Miller
Respondent:
Cobb County State Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller (PS) v. Lengrich et al
as 1:2023cv02741
Petitioner:
Haywood Eugene Miller
Defendant:
No Named Respondent
Respondent:
Jason Lengrich and State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Kauffman et al
as 2:2019cv04278
Petitioner:
EUGENE MILLER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT KEVIN KAUFFMAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Kauffman et al
as 3:2019cv01364
Petitioner:
Eugene Miller
Respondent:
Attorney General of Pennsylvania and Kevin Kauffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2016cv00107
Petitioner:
Joel Eugene Miller, Jr
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Smith
as 4:2015cv00253
Petitioner:
Richard Eugene Miller
Respondent:
Cornell Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLER v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE et al
as 2:2015cv00153
Petitioner:
EUGENE MILLER
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF _____
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stacy Miller v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-10436
Petitioner - Appellant:
STACY EUGENE MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
MILLER v. BUTLER CO. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2011cv00070
Petitioner:
CONRAD EUGENE MILLER
Respondent:
BUTLER CO. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and JEFFREY AYRES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Lieppin et al
as 1:2009cv00028
Petitioner:
Michael Eugene Miller, Sr.
Respondent:
H. G. Lieppin, Federal Bureau of Prisons, James N Cross and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
