General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
FLICK v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv01664
Petitioner: JONATHAN FLICK
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLICK v. MASON
as 2:2021cv00042
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JAMES SORBER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY and others
Petitioner: THOMAS FLICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLICK v. MASON et al
as 3:2020cv00252
Respondent: WILLIAM SHAW, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO and BERNADETTE MASON
Petitioner: THOMAS EDWARD FLICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lawson et al v. SUPT. Garman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01174
Petitioner: Howard Lawson, Jonathan P. Jones and Thomas Flick
Respondent: SUPT. Garman and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Flick v. Joseph Meko
as 17-5812
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL JOSEPH FLICK
Respondent - Appellee: JOSEPH P. MEKO
Flick v. State of Maryland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00778
Petitioner: Russell Gerald Flick
Respondent: State of Maryland and Michael Capasso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLICK v. GIROUX et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00080
Petitioner: JASON RAY FLICK
Respondent: NANCY GIROUX and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Flick v. Joseph Meko
as 14-5760
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL JOSEPH FLICK
Respondent - Appellee: JOSEPH P. MEKO
Flick v. Meko We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv00287
Petitioner: Michael Joseph Flick
Respondent: Joseph Meko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Flick v. Millicent Warren We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-2542
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID FLICK
Respondent - Appellee: MILLICENT WARREN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?