Cases 1 - 10 of 101
AZAR EL v. CABARRUS COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00362
Petitioner:
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL doing business as JERIMY LOVE
Respondent:
CABARRUS COUNTY, CABARRUS COUNTY JAIL, MIKE DOWNS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Azar El v. Cabarrus County et al
as 3:2024cv00423
Petitioner:
Rashaud Hussein Azar El doing business as Jerimy Love
Respondent:
Cabarrus County, Cabarrus County Jail, Mike Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sayidin v. Warner
as 2:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
Mahamad Hussein Sayidin
Respondent:
Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hussein v. Warden Neely
as 7:2022cv01566
Petitioner:
Aliet Hussein
Respondent:
Warden Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AZAR EL v. HALE et al
as 1:2022cv00998
Petitioner:
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL
Respondent:
JAXSON HALE and UNIT MANAGER DENISE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Azar El v. Hale et al
as 3:2022cv00372
Petitioner:
Rashaud Hussein Azar El
Respondent:
Jaxson Hale and Denise Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hussein v. Penzone
as 2:2021cv02206
Petitioner:
Mustafa Nabeel Hussein
Respondent:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hussein v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2021cv02115
Petitioner:
Mustafa Nabeel Hussein
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Warden et al
as 2:2021cv01147
Plaintiff:
Issam Hussein Abu-Ghosh, Frederick Banks and Issam-Abu Gosh
Defendant:
Psychology, Trust Fund Supervisor, S Ma'at and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Warden
as 1:2020cv00258
Respondent:
Warden, Psychology, Warden S. Ma'at' and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks, Issam Hussein Abu-Ghosh and Issam-Abu Gosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
