Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Fillmore v. State of Florida Prosecutor's Office for Broward County et al
as 0:2024cv60132
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Fillmore
Defendant:
State of Florida Prosecutor's Office for Broward County, Michael J. Satz, Christina Strandell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hoover v. Clarke
as 1:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Malik Raheem Hoover
Defendant:
H. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOOVER EL v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2023cv00271
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Respondent:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randall v. Renzi et al
as 9:2022cv01381
Petitioner:
Jarrod Carl Randall
Respondent:
Hon. Judge Eugene Renzi, Kristopher Sterns, Kim Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hoover v. State of South Carolina
as 0:2022cv04498
Petitioner:
Mr. Billy G. Hoover
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Director, Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pratt III v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2022cv00479
Petitioner:
Herbert Hoover Pratt III
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoover v. Segal
as 1:2022cv01104
Petitioner:
Stephanie K Hoover
Respondent:
Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hoover v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00044
Petitioner:
Paul Michael Hoover
Respondent:
Warden M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hoover v. Bowers
as 5:2021cv00118
Petitioner:
Paul Michael Hoover
Respondent:
F.J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Price v. Hoover
as 5:2020cv00249
Respondent:
Warden Hoover
Petitioner:
Sean Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
