General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,030
Lewis-Bey v. Cox
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff: Carlos Devon Lewis-Bey
Defendant: J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Devasko Lewis v. Warden
as 24-11502
Petitioner: DEVASKO DEWAYNE LEWIS
Respondent: WARDEN, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Prison
WATKINS v. SUPERINTENDENT RIVELLO et al
as 5:2024cv01942
Petitioner: LEWIS T. WATKINS
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT RIVELLO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Warden Nance
as 8:2024cv02266
Petitioner: Justin Jamal Lewis
Respondent: Warden Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00039
Petitioner: Vashun Lewis
Respondent: S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis v. Warden of USP Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00064
Petitioner: Vashun Lewis
Respondent: Warden of USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Apodaca v. Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00634
Petitioner: James Lewis Apodaca
Respondent: Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner: Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent: Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cain v. Davids
as 5:2024cv10684
Petitioner: Brandon Lewis Cain
Respondent: John David and John Davids
Lewis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00996
Petitioner: Derrick Lewis
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?