General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 744
Amador v. Anderson
as 2:2024cv00737
Petitioner: Daniel S Amador, II
Respondent: Lisa Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puchner v. Maxwell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00478
Petitioner: John D Puchner
Respondent: Mike Maxwell, Lisa Neubauer, Eric Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fry v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv01538
Petitioner: Bruce Renault Fry
Respondent: Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Warden, Highland County Justice Center
as 1:2024cv00128
Petitioner: Lisa Davis and Elizabeth Ann Davis
Respondent: Warden, Highland County Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DEVIVO v. FRANCESCHINNI
as 1:2024cv05639
Petitioner: LISA A. DEVIVO
Respondent: REBECCA FRANCESCHINNI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Douglas v. Wisner et al
as 6:2024cv00074
Petitioner: Matthew Joseph Douglas
Respondent: Geri Wisner, Matthew J. Hall and Lisa Otipoby-Herbert
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303 Habeas Corpus - Indian Civil Rights Act (detention)
May v. Howard
as 2:2024cv10829
Petitioner: Lisa Diane May
Respondent: Jeremy Howard
Traylor v. Stenseth We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2024cv00470
Petitioner: Raymond Joseph Traylor, Sr.
Respondent: Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Teshome Sameru v. Lisa Stenseth
as 24-1077
Petitioner: Teshome Sok Sameru
Respondent: Lisa Stenseth, Warden
Watkins v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv00148
Petitioner: Randall Watkins
Respondent: Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?