General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Jones v. Foley
as 1:2022cv02033
Petitioner: Michael Jones
Respondent: Warden Keith Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Williams We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01350
Petitioner: Michael Jones
Respondent: Warden Mark K. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Payne We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv05109
Respondent: State of Arkansas and Dexter Payne
Petitioner: Dustin Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Davis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00564
Petitioner: Michael Jones
Respondent: Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Davis
as 4:2020cv00806
Petitioner: Michael Jones
Respondent: Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Chapman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv14068
Petitioner: Paul Michael Jones
Respondent: Willis Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Capra
as 1:2018cv03756
Petitioner: Michael Jones
Respondent: Superintendent Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. FERGUSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00963
Petitioner: ANDRE MICHAEL JONES
Respondent: TAMMY L. FERGUSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Jones v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 17-1334
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL JONES
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Joseph Jones v. Richard Graham, Jr.
as 17-6082
Petitioner - Appellant: JOSEPH MICHAEL JONES
Respondent - Appellee: RICHARD J. GRAHAM, JR. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?