Cases 1 - 10 of 39
KING v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
BRAD KING
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY, MAC MCDUFFIE and WILLIAM MCCLURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CRESSWELL v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 2:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
JOSEPH PAUL CRESSWELL
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA and MAC MCDUFFIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McDuffie v. Rock Island County
as 3:2023cv03960
Petitioner:
Yolanduis L. McDuffie
Respondent:
Rock Island County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDuffie v. Boulet
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Harold McDuffie
Defendant:
P. Boulet
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McDuffie v. Jackson-Mitchell
as 3:2022cv00098
Petitioner:
William McDuffie
Respondent:
Warden Wanza Jackson-Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDuffie v. Sandage
as 1:2021cv01014
Petitioner:
Brandon Christopher McDuffie
Respondent:
Jon Sandage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McDuffy v. Sandage
as 1:2020cv01453
Respondent:
Jon Sandage
Petitioner:
Dery McDuffy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McDuffie v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2019cv02288
Petitioner:
Shawn McDuffie
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDuffie v. Smith
as 3:2019cv00051
Respondent:
Warden Aimee Smith
Petitioner:
Eugene McDuffie
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCDUFFY v. WARDEN
as 2:2019cv00283
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
JAMES MCDUFFY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
