Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Jennifer Larsen v. Wellness Path Medical, et al
as 24-5113
Petitioner:
JENNIFER WIDENER LARSEN
Respondent:
WELLNESS PATH MEDICAL, SHERIFF STEVE REAMS, WCSO and SHERIFF F/N/U HEYER, LCSO
Larsen v. Wellness Path Medical, et al
as 24-1034
Petitioner:
JENNIFER WIDENER LARSEN
Respondent:
WELLNESS PATH MEDICAL, STEVE REAMS, Sheriff, WCSO and HEYER, Sheriff, LCSO
Sell (PS) v. People of the State of Colorado, The
as 1:2024cv00193
Petitioner:
Aaron Michael Sell
Respondent:
People of the State of Colorado, The
Defendant:
Steve Reams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jennifer Larsen v. Wellness Path Medical, et al
as 23-6073
Petitioner / Appellant:
JENNIFER WIDENER LARSEN
Respondent / Appellee:
WELLNESS PATH MEDICAL, SHERIFF STEVE REAMS, WCSO and SHERIFF F/N/U HEYER, LCSO
Larsen (PS) v. Wellness Path Medical et al
as 1:2023cv03007
Petitioner:
Jennifer Widener Larsen
Respondent:
Wellness Path Medical, Steve Reams and Heyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larsen v. Wellness Path Medical et al
as 3:2023cv01155
Petitioner:
Jennifer Widener Larsen
Respondent:
Wellness Path Medical, Sheriff Steve Reams and Sheriff f/n/u Heyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Reams v. Gibson et al
as 4:2022cv00699
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Reams
Defendant:
James Gibson and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reames v. South Carolina, State of
as 3:2022cv01830
Petitioner:
Terry Eugene Reames
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jesse Ream v. Brandon Kelly
as 22-35259
Petitioner / Appellant:
JESSE L. REAM
Respondent / Appellee:
BRANDON KELLY, Superintendent
Ream v. Kelley
as 6:2021cv00927
Petitioner:
Jesse L. Ream
Respondent:
Brandon Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
