Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Steelman v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00599
Petitioner:
Robert Keith Steelman
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Catchings v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2020cv01692
Respondent:
State of Alabama and Steve Giddens
Petitioner:
Robert Keith Catchings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KEITH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv03859
Petitioner:
ROBERT KEITH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KEITH v. (BOP) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2016cv01774
Petitioner:
ROBERT KEITH
Respondent:
(BOP) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hogan v. Livingston
as 1:2016cv00421
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Robert Keith Hogan, III
Respondent:
Brad Livingston
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hogan v. Livingston
as 5:2016cv00335
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Robert Keith Hogan
Respondent:
Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KEITH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2015cv04771
Petitioner:
ROBERT KEITH
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robert Brooks v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-50422
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT KEITH BROOKS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Brooks v. Stephen
as 7:2014cv00102
Petitioner:
Robert Keith Brooks
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Donahue
as 3:2013cv00658
Petitioner:
Robert Keith Ward
Respondent:
Michael Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
