Cases 1 - 10 of 302
Gresham v. White
as 1:2024cv02641
Petitioner:
Shelton Gresham
Respondent:
Jermaine White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shelton v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00329
Petitioner:
Elwood Shelton
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shelton v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00350
Petitioner:
Elwood Shelton
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norman Shelton v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, et al
as 24-1203
Plaintiff:
NORMAN SHELTON
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
Dwight Shelton v. Bryan Birkholz
as 2:2024cv01249
Petitioner:
Dwight Shelton
Respondent:
Bryan Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Shelton Mitchell v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-12674
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHELTON MITCHELL
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Norman Shelton v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, et al
as 23-2009
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORMAN SHELTON
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
Benoite v. USA
as 7:2023cv00050
Petitioner:
Shelton John Benoite
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shelton v. Lumpkin
as 2:2023cv00051
Petitioner:
Gregory James Shelton
Respondent:
TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHELTON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
as 1:2023cv00100
Petitioner:
NORMAN SHELTON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and WARDEN SCI ALBION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
