Cases 1 - 10 of 167
Smith v. Wagner
as 2:2024cv01083
Respondent:
Jeffrey A Wagner
Petitioner:
Tyrone Davis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rowe v. Wagner
as 3:2024cv05196
Petitioner:
Anthony C Rowe
Respondent:
Jack Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WAGNER v. DIXON
as 3:2023cv23972
Petitioner:
KRISTEN ELIZABETH WAGNER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wagner v. Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00369
Petitioner:
Gregory Scott Wagner
Respondent:
Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gorman v. Brewer et al
as 4:2022cv00666
Petitioner:
Alan Gorman
Respondent:
Chris Brewer, Joe Biden, Merritt Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOHR v. PENCHISHEN et al
as 5:2022cv03458
Petitioner:
PATRICK MOHR
Respondent:
DAVID PENCHISHEN, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, MICHAEL ACEVEDO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wagner v. State of Missouri
as 4:2022cv00890
Petitioner:
ReKwane Shevell Wagner
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wagner, Jr. v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2022cv00080
Petitioner:
Wayne Dale Wagner, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wagner v. Mahoning County Sheriff et al
as 4:2022cv00475
Petitioner:
Keith M. Wagner
Respondent:
Mahoning County Sheriff and US Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WAGNER v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 3:2022cv00030
Petitioner:
THOMAS FRANK WAGNER
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
