General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 530
Ray (PS) v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv02415
Petitioner: Austin Ray
Defendant: State of Colorado and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OWENS v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2024cv00695
Petitioner: AUSTIN RANDY OWENS
Respondent: U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lang v. Ms. Brown et al
as 4:2024cv00788
Respondent: Ms. Brown, Ms. Rebella, Mr. Contrell and others
Petitioner: Barbara Lang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MUHAMMAD v. O'GRADY et al
as 2:2024cv04128
Respondent: CHIEF PILEGGI, THE CHESTER POLICE STATION, CHIEF AUSTIN and others
Petitioner: KING WALID A MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Preetorius v. Rule et al
as 4:2024cv00727
Respondent: Mr. FNU Austin, Ms. FNU Rebella and Warden FNU Rule
Petitioner: Regina M. Preetorius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pryor v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2024cv00048
Respondent: James Salmonsen and Austin Knudsen
Petitioner: Jesse Thomas Pryor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin v. McGuiness
as 6:2024cv06443
Respondent: T. McGuiness
Petitioner: Sean Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Langford
as 24-3086
Petitioner: AUSTIN JONES
Respondent: DONALD LANGFORD
Ronald Austin v. William Boher
as 24-6578
Respondent: WILLIAM BOHER, Warden
Petitioner: RONALD DURELLE AUSTIN
Gotschall v. Salmonsen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00068
Respondent: Austin Knudsen and James Salmonsen
Petitioner: Robert Gotschall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?