Cases 1 - 10 of 505
Wolfe v. Rivello et al
as 3:2024cv00814
Petitioner:
James A Wolfe
Respondent:
John Rivello, Michelle A Henery, Seth F. Butner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Wolfe v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 24-1462
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. WOLFE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI and OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Wolfe v. Rivello et al
as 3:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
JAMES A. WOLFE
Respondent:
John Rivello and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wolfe v. Rivello et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Petitioner:
James A Wolfe
Respondent:
John Rivello and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Ramirez v. Aguilar et al
as 1:2023cv01538
Petitioner:
Narciso Ramirez
Respondent:
Mark S. Aguilar, Judge David Wolf, Judge Eric Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez-Santana v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv01641
Petitioner:
Miguel Ramirez-Santana
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Donald W. Washington, Chad Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Orlando Larry v. R. Wolfe
as 23-6868
Petitioner / Appellant:
ORLANDO LARRY
Respondent / Appellee:
R. M. WOLFE, Warden
Liounis v. Wolfe
as 5:2023hc02191
Petitioner:
Peter Liounis
Respondent:
R. M. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jurone Hammond v. John Wolfe
as 23-6788
Petitioner / Appellant:
JURONE HAMMOND
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN S. WOLFE, Warden
Wolf v. Buckner
as 4:2023cv00849
Petitioner:
Timothy M. Wolf, Jr.
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
