Death Penalty Cases
Cases 181 - 190 of 4,566
Miller v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00506
Plaintiff: Alan Eugene Miller
Defendant: John Q. Hamm, Terry Raybon and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JESSE BELL v. RICKY DIXON
as 1:2022cv00211
Petitioner: Jesse Bell
Respondent: Secretary RICKY DIXON and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steven Bixby v. Bryan Stirling
as 22-4
Petitioner / Appellant: STEVEN VERNON BIXBY
Respondent / Appellee: BRYAN P. STIRLING, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections and LYDELL CHESTNUT, Deputy Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
Smith v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00497
Plaintiff: Kenneth Eugene Smith
Defendant: John Q. Hamm and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noel Jackson v. Ron Broomfield
as 22-99011
Petitioner: NOEL JACKSON
Respondent: RON BROOMFIELD, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin
Darryl Stinski v. Warden GDCP
as 22-12898
Petitioner / Appellant: DARRYL SCOTT STINSKI
Respondent / Appellee: GDCP WARDEN
Vasquez v. Lumpkin
as 22-70009
Petitioner / Appellant: Richard Vasquez
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
BOOKER v. DIXON et al
as 1:2022cv00204
Petitioner: STEPHEN TODD BOOKER
Respondent: RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timothy Dunlap v. David Paskett
as 22-3776
Petitioner / Appellant: TIMOTHY ALAN DUNLAP
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID PASKETT, Warden
Womble v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01429
Petitioner: Brian Allen Womble
Respondent: David Shinn and James Kimble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?