Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Wood v. Workman
as 5:2010cv00829
Petitioner:
Termane Wood
Respondent:
Randall G Workman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bobby Woods v. Brad Livingston
as 09-70035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY WAYNE WOODS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Woods v. Thaler
as 1:2009cv00789
Petitioner:
Bobby Wayne Woods
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Steven Woods v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-70027
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN MICHAEL WOODS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Dwayne Woods v. Stephen Sinclair
as 09-99003
Petitioner - Appellant:
DWAYNE ANTHONY WOODS
Respondent - Appellee:
STEPHEN SINCLAIR
Jeffery Wood v. Nathaniel Quarterman, Director
as 09-70011
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFERY LEE WOOD
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Joseph Wood, III v. Charles Ryan
as 08-99003
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH RUDOLPH WOOD, III
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and CHARLES L. RYAN, interim Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
WOODS v. BUSS
as 1:2007cv00411
Petitioner:
DAVID LEON WOODS and DAVID LEON WOODS
Respondent:
ED BUSS and ED BUSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Wood v. Campbell et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2004cv00509
Plaintiff:
Holly Wood
Defendant:
Donal Campbell , Troy King and Grantt Culliver
Respondent:
Richard F. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wood, et al v. Stewart, et al
as 4:1998cv00053
Petitioner:
Joseph Rudolph Wood, III
Respondent:
Terry Stewart , George Herman and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
