Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Patterson v. State of Texas
as 1:2007cv00469
Petitioner:
John P Patterson
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MITCHELL v. BEARD et al
as 2:2007cv00144
Petitioner:
WAYNE MITCHELL
Respondent:
JEFFEREY BEARD, JEFFEREY BEARD, LOUIS S. FOLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Robert P Wilson v. Warden
as 2:2007cv00519
Petitioner:
Robert P Wilson
Respondent:
Robert L Ayers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Cecil Clayton v. Donald P. Roper
as 06-3260
Petitioner - Appellant:
Cecil Clayton
Respondent - Appellee:
Al Luebbers and Donald P. Roper
Abdul-Salaam v. Beard, et al
as 4:2002cv02124
Petitioner:
Abdul-Salaam
Respondent:
Jeffrey Beard , William S. Stickman, III. , Joseph P. Mazurkiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MORRIS v. BEARD, et al
as 2:2001cv03070
Petitioner:
KELVIN X. MORRIS
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD , CONNER BLAINE and JOSEPH P. MAZURKIEWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BREAKIRON v. HORN, et al
as 2:2000cv00300
Petitioner:
MARK BREAKIRON
Respondent:
MARTIN HORN , CONNOR BLAINE and JOSEPH P. MAZURKIEWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
FAHY v. HORN, et al
as 2:1999cv05086
Petitioner:
HENRY FAHY
Respondent:
MARTIN HORN , CONNER BLAINE, JR and JOSEPH P. MAZURKIEWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
CHESTER v. HORN, et al
as 2:1999cv04111
Petitioner:
FRANK ROBERT CHESTER
Respondent:
MARTIN HORN , PHILIP JOHNSON , JOSEPH P. MAZURKIEWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BLYSTONE v. HORN, et al
as 2:1999cv00490
Petitioner:
SCOTT WAYNE BLYSTONE
Respondent:
MARTIN HORN , JAMES S. PRICE and JOSEPH P. MAZURKIEWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
