Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Creech v. Richardson
as 1:2023cv00463
Petitioner:
Thomas Eugene Creech
Respondent:
Tim Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Thomas v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv01005
Petitioner:
Steven Alan Thomas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry, Jr. v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv03144
Petitioner:
George Thomas Curry, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Death Penalty)
Robin Row v. Janell Clement, et al
as 23-99004
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBIN LEE ROW
Respondent / Appellee:
JANELL CLEMENT, THOMAS J. BEAUCLAIR and BRIAN UNDERWOOD
Thomas James Moore v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-14207
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS JAMES MOORE
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Thomas Springs v. Dexter Payne
as 22-3399
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas Leo Springs
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Richardson v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
Thomas Richardson
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMAS v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2020cv01371
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
LEETON JAHWANZA THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp
GROOMS v. THOMAS
as 1:2019cv00396
Petitioner:
Timmy Euvonne Grooms
Respondent:
EDWARD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00993
Petitioner:
Edward Thomas James
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
