Cases 111 - 120 of 375,442
Sturkey v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Willie Joe Sturkey
Defendant:
State of Florida, Hillsborough County Jail, Susan Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonning v. Clifford
as 1:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Amy Rose Bonning
Defendant:
Matthew Clifford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Bottley
as 3:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Keith Wayne Robertson
Defendant:
Jarrob Bottley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Montgomery County Correction Facility
as 1:2024cv01290
Plaintiff:
Dashaye Robert Nelson
Defendant:
Montgomery County Correction Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Archa v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Rashawn Archa
Defendant:
The State of New York, NYS Department of Correctional Services The Warden of Auburn Correctional Facility, Correction Officer Giboo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Willett et al
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Willett, Marc Galvez and Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Woods v. Shawn Wills, et al
as 24-1928
Plaintiff:
MARK WOODS
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER SHAWN WILLS, #3680 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O THOMAS STRAIN, #4005 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O LT. HOYT, #225 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
David James, Jr. v. Roanoke City Sheriff's Office
as 24-6479
Plaintiff:
DAVID RANDALL JAMES, JR.
Defendant:
ROANOKE CITY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Soliz v. Nueces County
as 24-40353
Plaintiff:
Jesus Soliz
Defendant:
Nueces County, Armar Correctional Healthcare Services, Roberto Cano and others
Burleson v. Harris County Medical Department
as 4:2024cv01872
Plaintiff:
LaDorthy Burleson
Defendant:
Harris County Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
