Cases 161 - 170 of 376,254
Johnson v. Brill et al
as 1:2024cv11459
Plaintiff:
Jobari J Johnson
Defendant:
Sgt Brill, Lt Russo, C.O Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harris v. Kinner et al.
as 4:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
Cornelius L. Harris
Defendant:
Joshua A. Kinner and Correctional Sgt. Sammons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. McNevin
as 4:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Jermeal White
Defendant:
P. McNevin, Lieutenant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis, Daniel v. Stafford, Bridgette et al
as 3:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Daniel F.W. Lewis
Defendant:
Bridgette L. Stafford, Rey R. Palop, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Sean Hicks
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Unknown makers and seller of TDCJ's Algorythym computer, Unknown implementors of the unknown algorythym computor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland v. Weston et al
as 2:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Lamundrick R. Cleveland
Defendant:
Kathryn D. Weston and Amie M. Assent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Auburndale Police Department et al
as 8:2024cv01325
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Hart
Defendant:
Auburndale Police Department, Belcher, Officer Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allan Schubert v. Kenneth Adebonojo
as 24-5148
Plaintiff:
Allan D. Schubert
Defendant:
Kenneth A. Adebonojo, Assistant United States Attorney
Lockhart v. Marley (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Lockhart
Defendant:
Josh Marley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Le v. Mims et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Le
Defendant:
Beth Mims, City of Jemison and Rickey Patrick Self
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
