Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Daniel Brown v. Boone County, AR, et al
as 15-3041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Ray Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
Boone County, Arkansas, Former Sheriff Danny Hickman, Sheriff Mike Moore and others
Defendant:
Boone County Detention Center
Brown v. Dillon County et al
as 4:2015cv00711
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Brown
Defendant:
Dillon County , Dillon County Sheriff's Office , Major Hulon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner Brown v. Caddo Parish Sheriff Dept, et al
as 14-30148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONNER RAY BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CADDO PARISH, on behalf of Emergency Response Team, JOHN DOE, A. L. DINKINS, JR. and others
Brown v. Boone County, Arkansas, et al
as 3:2014cv03005
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Brown
Defendant:
Boone County, Arkansas, Boone County Detention Center, Danny Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Clem et al
as 1:2013cv03008
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Brown
Defendant:
Jason Clem, Kathleen S Green, Jeeter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Green et al
as 1:2013cv02394
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Brown
Defendant:
Kathleen S Green, Ronald Dryden, Jason Clem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Green et al
as 2:2013cv21541
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Brown
Defendant:
Kathleen S. Green, Ronald Dryden, Jason Clem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Mumfrey et al
as 8:2013cv02151
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Brown
Defendant:
Mumfrey, John Doe and Roderick Sowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Mumfrey et al
as 1:2013cv00872
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Brown
Defendant:
Mumfrey, John Doe and Roderick Sowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Clem et al
as 1:2013cv00871
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Brown
Defendant:
Jason Clem, Kathleen S Green, Jeeter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
