Cases 11 - 20 of 20
King v. Meyer
as 3:2015cv00726
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee King
Defendant:
William C. Meyer, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyer v. Joosten
as 2:2015cv01056
Plaintiff:
Christopher C Meyer
Defendant:
Cindy L Joosten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv00058
Plaintiff:
Bernard Battle
Defendant:
United States of America, J. Squires, B. Kunckle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Floyd v. Olshefski et al
as 3:2013cv00578
Plaintiff:
David L Floyd
Defendant:
Olshefski, Jamie Phillips, C Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Merrival, Jr v Miller, et al
as 1:2012cv00127
Defendant:
Donroy Robert Merrival, Jr, Paul D Miller, H Loraine Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales v. Meyer et al
as 8:2012cv00972
Plaintiff:
Juan Maldonado Morales
Defendant:
Micheal C. Meyer, Michael Ray and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Wood et al
as 1:2011cv00984
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Steven P. Wood, Diane C. Walsh, Paul R. Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Wood et al
as 1:2010cv01014
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Steven P. Wood, Jerome O. Herlihy, Paul R. Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
I.S.B. et al v. State of South Dakota Commissioner of Administration et al
as 4:2010cv04142
Plaintiff:
I.S.B., Willie Reed, IV, Thanh Quang Ngo and others
Defendant:
State of South Dakota Commissioner of Administration, South Dakota Department of Revenue & Regulations, South Dakota Bureau of Personell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barney v. Palmer et al
as 2:2007cv14818
Plaintiff:
Charles Barney
Defendant:
Carmen Palmer, C Meyers, J Saladin and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
