Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Johnson v. Gann et al
as 1:2019cv00005
Defendant:
T Grasser, FNU Satchell, FNU Watts and others
Plaintiff:
David Darnell Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Richland Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2018cv01091
Plaintiff:
David Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Richland Parish Detention Center, Sgt Holcutt, Ricky Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson, David v. Dane County Jail
as 3:2018cv00437
Plaintiff:
David M. Johnson
Defendant:
Dane County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2018cv00232
Plaintiff:
Robert Wesley Jackson
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, Todd Harris, Shelby N Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00586
Plaintiff:
Gregory Perry
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Unknown Rogers, Unknown Tarasova and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv01961
Plaintiff:
David E Johnson
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Det. Murphy, Det. Stover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Stephens et al
as 6:2016cv00283
Plaintiff:
Robert Wesley Jackson
Defendant:
William Stephens, Todd Harris, Shelby N Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Armor Health Correctional Services
as 0:2015cv62057
Plaintiff:
David Z Johnson
Defendant:
Armor Health Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Egan, Sr. v. Neil Horn
as 15-7381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. NEIL ANDERSON HORN, VIRGINIA STATE BAR, Lawyer licensing official and DAVID J. JOHNSON, Executive Director Virginia Independent Defense Commission
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2015ct03195
Plaintiff:
David Harold Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America and James C. Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
