Cases 11 - 20 of 21
O'Brien v. Sied et al
as 1:2016cv01426
Plaintiff:
Kory T. O'Brien
Defendant:
Sied and J. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Brien v. Sied, et al.
as 1:2016cv01178
Plaintiff:
Kory T. O'Brien
Defendant:
Sied, Jane Doe and J. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Stephens et al
as 4:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
Troy Lee Perkins
Defendant:
William Stephens and T O'Hare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. Puffenbarger et al
as 1:2015cv03022
Plaintiff:
James A. Henson, Jr.
Defendant:
Janet Puffenbarger, T. O. Marchinke, O. Rounds, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Samuels et al
as 5:2015cv01782
Plaintiff:
Daniel-Ralph Bishop
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr, Jeffrey Grondolsky, J L Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holiday v. DHO Disciplinary Hearing Board of BOP et al
as 1:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Daud Abdullah Holiday
Defendant:
DHO Disciplinary Hearing Board of BOP, T. Lane, T. O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HAIZLIP v. ALSTON et al
as 1:2014cv00770
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE DUMONT HAIZLIP
Defendant:
RICK ALSTON, BENJAMIN ALTIZER, DUANE JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00316
Defendant:
Theresa Arrendale, Larry Bennett, Cindy Booth and others
Plaintiff:
Renee Shereen McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00102
Defendant:
Larry Bennett, Nichole Brown, Greg Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Renee Shereen McKenzie and Lance Conway Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hallman et al
as 2:2013cv00950
Defendant:
Prisoner Mohamed Ahmed, (EOCI) Asst. Supt. Bridgette Amsberry, BHS Counselor Anderson and others
OSP:
ODOC Health Serv. Mgr. Steve Shelton and Dr. John Vargo
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gregory Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
