Cases 11 - 20 of 5,834
Alter (PS) v. Gates et al
as 1:2024cv01483
Plaintiff:
William Neil Alter
Defendant:
John Gates, Raymond Lee, III, Tommy Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Torgerson et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Detective Adam Torgerson and Shannon Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Benny et al
as 3:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Javaun Johnson
Defendant:
A. Benny and Jason Christopher Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrone Morgan v. Doctor Poorman, et al
as 24-11655
Plaintiff:
TYRONE M. MORGAN
Defendant:
DOCTOR POORMAN, ADAM PYLITT and FRANK MIGILIORE
Jones (PS) v. Deines et al
as 1:2024cv01429
Plaintiff:
Adam Jones
Defendant:
Curtis Deines, April Ogley, Robert Dick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy Rindahl v. Tim Reisch, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Ex-Secretary of Health, Joan Adam, Interim Secretary of Health, Kristi Noem, Governor for the State of South Dakota and others
Villamor v. Metcalfe et al
as 2:2024cv00940
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Fabian Villamor
Defendant:
Officer J. Metcalfe, Officer D. Ketring, Officer A. Bookman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams-Clark v. McClelland et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Adam Y. Williams-Clark
Defendant:
Chief Judge Troy Russell McClelland and City of Cumming, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Precythe et al
as 4:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Desmond Arnez Mills
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kohute v. Adams
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Kohute
Defendant:
Lankston Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
