Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 539
Jaquan Lee v. Heath Underwood, et al
as 24-3271
Plaintiff: JAQUAN LEE
Defendant: HEATH UNDERWOOD, AARON BUSHEY, DAVID SCHEURER and others
Heath v. Parte et al
as 2:2024cv00158
Plaintiff: Secial Heath
Defendant: Kay Parte, DeAnn Parte, Stacy Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Heath v. Carillio
as 2:2024cv00155
Plaintiff: Secial Heath
Defendant: Keyon Carillio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Martinez v. Heath et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00516
Plaintiff: Fred Feleki Martinez
Defendant: Heath and D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
COOPER v. DIXON et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff: LEMUEL L COOPER
Defendant: RICKY DIXON and HEATH HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. FINKE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff: LARRANCE DURELLE MOORE
Defendant: OKALOOSA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, OKALOOSA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, DAVID RICHARD FINKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nevels v. Soriano
as 3:2024cv01578
Plaintiff: Eric J. Nevels
Defendant: Rommel Soriano, Quincy Heath, Brandon Kirch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff: Roy Devon Hill
Defendant: Fulton County Jail, Pat Labat, Lenwood Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. E-Comms et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff: Secial Heath
Defendant: E-Comms and Candice Teer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hill v. Johnson et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant: Steve Johnson, Dana Howell, Rick Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?