Cases 21 - 30 of 2,250
Anthony Cain v. Thomas Evans, et al
as 24-5194
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CAIN, aka Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
THOMAS EVANS, Sergeant, DANA PENNIGER, Lieutenant, JORDAN KIESTER, Lieutenant and others
Brandon v. Sherburne County Sheriff et al
as 0:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Morris Lee Brandon, III
Defendant:
Sherburne County Sheriff, Joel Brott and Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carl Bell v. Kim Ardery, et al
as 24-1373
Plaintiff:
CARL EDWARD BELL
Defendant:
KIM ARDERY, Medical Care Supervisor/CHCA at SCI- Benner Township, MORRIS HOUSER, Superintendent, GEORGE LITTLE, Secretary of Department of Corrections and others
Arnold III v. Coleman et al
as 1:2024cv01471
Plaintiff:
Eugene Nathaniel Arnold III
Defendant:
Jennifer Coleman, Judge Office, Mr. Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry, III v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Henry, III
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Laurel Harry, George M. Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. MORRIS et al
as 1:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
TODD C. FORD, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN P. MORRIS, DET. I.C.J. PILIGNO, A. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Collins v. J. Oats
as 24-6126
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LASHARN COLLINS
Defendant:
J. D. OATS, Assistant Warden, C. WASHINGTON, Inmate Program Manager and BERNARD MORRIS, Religious Advisor to the Faith Review Committee for Virginia DOC
Drakos v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas Drakos, II
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Melissa Morris and Harris County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes v. Sheriff Trevino et al
as 4:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Forrest Stokes
Defendant:
Sheriff Trevino, Judge Melissa Morris and Mayor Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
