Cases 21 - 30 of 111
Wilson Bey v. Taylor et al
as 5:2021ct03017
Defendant:
B.L. Baugham, J.K. Richarson, C.N. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander J. Wilson Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON BEY v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2020cv01058
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER J. WILSON BEY
Defendant:
J. K. RICHARSON, B. L. BAUGHAM, C. N. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Odom v. Taylor et al
as 1:2020cv01120
Defendant:
J. Taylor, Mitchell, Unknown CDCR Contractor for Prosthetics and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Bigoski Odom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ternaprovich et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01258
Plaintiff:
James Ternaprovich, Mario Reyes, Ronald T Franz and others
Defendant:
Louis Shicker, Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2020cv00341
Defendant:
FNU Sierra, FNU Smith, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
James West, Nathan Railey and Alexander Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grandinetti v. Valenzuela et al
as 1:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Hawaii Paroling Authority (HPA-DPS), Warden M. Frink, newer A/W D. Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Behl v. Peters et al
as 8:2019cv02608
Defendant:
R. Timothy Peters, Robert J. Krauss, E. C. Perry and others
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Behl, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battles v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv01727
Defendant:
K. Watts, J. Taylor, M. Pachero and others
Plaintiff:
Zelaja Alconna Battles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheat v. Holloway et al
as 5:2019cv05128
Defendant:
Deputy J. Rhodes, Deputy K. Cogdill, Deputy B. Jornagan and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lucas Wheat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Taylor
as 3:2019cv00096
Plaintiff:
Anthony Derrick Daniels
Defendant:
Joi J. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
