Cases 31 - 40 of 4,878
Tapia v. Anderson et al
as 4:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Israel Tapia
Defendant:
Marcus Anderson and Iliana S Magallane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Anderson v. McMillian
as 24-6495
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
MCMILLIAN, Medical Provider, ERIC DYE, Warden, JEFFREY DUNCAN, Assistant Warden and others
Albert Anderson v. McMillian
as 24-6492
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
MCMILLIAN, Medical Provider Individual and Official Capacity, ALEXANDER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Official Capacity, JANE DOE, Nurse Individual and Official Capacity and others
Dallas Hilt v. Chad Anderson
as 24-2053
Plaintiff:
Dallas Cody Hilt
Defendant:
Chad Anderson, Sheriff, Bates County Sheriff's Department
May v. Foreman et al
as 2:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Robert Foreman, Jennifer Arndt, Lisa Yeates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Correctional Staff at Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 3:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Randy Anderson
Defendant:
Correctional Staff at Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monderen v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Defendant:
William Stange, Latonia Young-Griffin, Timothy Seabaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Anderson et al
as 4:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Kevin Douglas McGee
Defendant:
CEO Donna Anderson, Valerie Huhn and Debra Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Geathers v. McNeil et al
as 4:2024cv02909
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Geathers
Defendant:
Larry McNeil and Clay Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ruhren v. Dotson, et al.
as 1:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruhren
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Anderson, A. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
